Synapse

A boundary that remembers.

Synapse is a private model boundary for organizations that use outside AI models, so that each provider receives only what a task needs and each send through it is recorded.

  • Bio-inspired system
  • Enterprises & institutions
  • Private model calls
  • Security & privacy
Synapse's connected local context, parallel checks, scoped work and checked return, with a separate application output dock.
Loading model

Local context stays active while independent requests use primary or adaptive checks. Each result returns through validation; application effects require their own authority.

Each proposed view is checked against what its observer has already received and what remains unresolved.

Used in Naevum’s engineering workflowsDesign your model boundary

What the research says

Your people already use outside models.

The open question is whether anyone can see what left, and to whom.

Breaches at organizations with high shadow-AI use cost $670,000 more on average. The figure describes model use nobody sanctioned and nobody recorded. Synapse turns it into sanctioned, recorded use: a policy owner decides what may leave, and each call is checked against its source and against what its destination has already seen.2

One task. A carefully chosen view.

An institution wants a model to help with a document. The institution holds much more information than that task requires.

The source owner assigns permitted information classes. Before dispatch, the capability fixes the observer and model, task policy, expiry and stopping conditions. The receiving model does not grant itself that authority.

  1. Bind the source

    Register the context against an immutable source snapshot and its provenance. Holder, actor, client and workspace identify the intended setting.

    Starts with
    An identified source and a bounded task.
    Produces
    A context record that can be examined.
  2. Choose the observer

    The destination and what it has already received matter to disclosure. Registering context does not itself authorize transmission.

  3. Reserve the effect

    Reserve task identity and cumulative call and byte allowances before transport. Concurrent work must account for the same finite budget.

A series of small views can reveal a larger picture.

A useful disclosure boundary considers the observer’s cumulative history.

Two individually limited requests may expose more together than either does alone. Synapse tracks what a particular observer has already received across effects, so admission can account for that accumulated view.

Source selection, task policy and allowed effects are distinct decisions. A supported coding projection also needs validation of returned edits and a recovery path back to the source. Each integration must specify the transformations and languages it supports.

Can the board pack go to an external model?

The CFO sets what may leave; the boundary applies that rule on every send. Illustrative.

  1. 1 of 5The finance team sends the board pack draft and its sources toward an external model for a summary.
  2. 2 of 5The boundary checks what this model provider has already received from the company before anything crosses.
  3. 3 of 5The clause on a pending acquisition stays local; the rest of the draft crosses to the model.Decision: The CFO’s policy keeps acquisition terms inside the company.
  4. 4 of 5The model’s summary returns through validation before anyone in finance relies on it.
  5. 5 of 5The send is recorded under its identity, and the CFO decides whether the summary goes into the board pack.Decision: The CFO accepts or rejects the summary.
Select any part of the drawingScroll to step · Esc to skipFig. 1
  1. 1 of 5A procurement lead asks an external model to summarize the liability clause of a supplier contract.
  2. 2 of 5The boundary finds that this provider already received the contract’s pricing annex for an earlier task.
  3. 3 of 5Together, the clause and the annex would reveal the supplier’s full terms, so the boundary holds the clause.Decision: The CFO’s policy forbids that combination for one provider.
  4. 4 of 5The procurement lead sees why and sends a narrower request without the supplier’s name; this one passes.Decision: The procurement lead chooses the narrower request.
  5. 5 of 5The held attempt and the send are both recorded, so the provider’s history stays accurate for the next request.
Select any part of the drawingScroll to step · Esc to skipFig. 1
  1. 1 of 5The boundary passes a quarterly summary and reserves the send under one identity before it crosses.
  2. 2 of 5The connection drops after sending: the model may have read the summary, yet no answer arrives.
  3. 3 of 5The send stays on record as uncertain, and the summary counts as seen by this provider.
  4. 4 of 5Reconciliation checks the existing send and its receipts under the same identity before any copy goes out again.
  5. 5 of 5The finance controller decides whether to repeat or abandon the request, knowing the provider may already hold it.Decision: The controller repeats or abandons the request.
Select any part of the drawingScroll to step · Esc to skipFig. 1

Where it changes the work.

Illustrative situations, connected to the mechanisms that make them possible.

Use outside intelligence on a bounded task

Institutions and R&D teams

A useful model needs context, while the organization holds a much larger sensitive source.

How it works
Select a source-bound projection and account for its disclosure to the actual observer before dispatch.
What changes
The organization can inspect the approved context, purpose and destination of the model work.

Recover an interrupted agent attempt

Software teams

A connection drops after a request may already have reached its provider.

How it works
The durable effect remains uncertain and reuses its exact identity during reconciliation.
What changes
Recovery can establish what happened without silently repeating an action or forgetting prior exposure.

Put a budget on an inference route

Compute operators

Concurrent requests can pass a separate check before either has charged its usage.

How it works
Transactional reservation binds admission to the request, with settlement linked to received evidence.
What changes
The inference route has a durable basis for concurrent resource accounting.
Explore the connected system

A missing answer does not mean nothing happened.

A connection disappears after dispatch. The model may have received the context even though its result never arrived.

Keep the identity

The job, step, source and policy binding remain attached to the effect.

Reconcile before repeating

Inspect the existing effect and its receipts. A fresh identifier cannot safely stand in for an unresolved attempt.

Recover with the record

Received results, interrupted work and abandonment retain their disclosure history. A recovery decision follows the known state.

Questions about Synapse.

Does Synapse protect every model, IDE and operating-system route?

Coverage is specified for each supported integration and deployment. A protected task route does not establish universal IDE interception or complete operating-system containment.

What does a dedicated deployment add?

It can change custody, compute location and the parties involved. Context admission, observer history and action controls still need to be designed and tested for that deployment.

Synapse in the stack.

Connected system

Institutional context

Temporal memory supplies source-aware knowledge.

Connected system

Continuing execution

An agent needs boundaries for every admitted effect.

Deployment option

Compute choices

Dedicated infrastructure is one deployment option.

Technical reference6 mechanisms · 1 further section

The mechanisms underneath.

The technical choices that give Synapse its particular behavior.

Immutable context admission
Context is bound to a source snapshot, provenance, holder, actor, client and workspace. Registration and disclosure authority remain distinct.
Cumulative observer history
Admission can consider what a destination has already received across several effects.
Reserve before transport
Effect identity and cumulative call and byte allowances are reserved before dispatch, including concurrent work.
Source and effect binding
Results belong to the job, step, source and policy they concern. Deduplication and recovery use that identity.
Durable uncertainty
An interrupted effect retains its history until reconciled. Abandonment does not erase disclosure.
Bounded transformation and recovery
Source selection, restricted projection, recovery objects and returned-edit validation have explicit supported-route and language limits.

One task. A carefully chosen view.

Synapse binds model work to an identified source, a chosen observer and a permitted effect. Cumulative disclosure history and durable recovery preserve the meaning of a task when work is concurrent or interrupted.

Bind the source. Register the context against an immutable source snapshot and its provenance. Holder, actor, client and workspace identify the intended setting.

Choose the observer. The destination and what it has already received matter to disclosure. Registering context does not itself authorize transmission.

Reserve the effect. Reserve task identity and cumulative call and byte allowances before transport. Concurrent work must account for the same finite budget.

Synapse in operation.

Synapse is used in Naevum’s engineering workflows. The context, admission and recovery mechanisms described here retain their own supported-route scope.

System story

From private knowledge to institutional intelligence

An illustrative institutional question that needs both history and controlled model context.

Follow the story

Which document would your CFO send to an outside model today, and which clause should never leave with it?

Design your model boundary